News

A public lecture by J. Peter Burgess

Who is responsible for terrorism? What does it mean to take responsibility for an act of terror? What does it mean to give responsibility? To deny responsibility for an act of terror? How has responsibility for preventing or stopping a terrorist attack? Who has responsibility for the consequences of a terrorist attack? Where and when does the responsibility begin, where does it end? Through a typology of « responsibility » the paper will draw analyse the discourse linking ‘responsibility’ and ‘sanity’ in the terrorism trial of Anders Behring Breivik, and draw conclusions about the special kind of accountability that applies to the unaccountably monstrous deed.

> Listen to the talk

By J. Peter Burgess, edited volume published by J. Peter Burgess (with with Michael Friedewald, Johann Čas, Rocco Bellanova and Walter Peissl)

This volume examines the relationship between privacy, surveillance and security, and the alleged privacy–security trade-off, focusing on the citizen’s perspective. Recent revelations of mass surveillance programmes clearly demonstrate the ever-increasing capabilities of surveillance technologies...

This article revisits the concept of sovereignty in political theory by applying tools adapted from Lacanian psychoanalytic theory...

Publication by J. Peter Burgess